The Secretary-General of the United Nations, ban Ki-moon agreed that the exclusion of Russia from the UN security Council resolution impossible. the Question leading the program "Vesti on the first day weekend" Sergei Brilev whether calls for the exclusion of Russia from the UN security Council, ban Ki-moon said: "Russia is one of the permanent members of the security Council "." I did not even want to explain the issues, which are not quite in the know, "- he said, reports " news Agency ". Ban Ki-moon agreed With the comment about the fact that technically, according to the UN Charter, the exclusion of Russia from the Security Council of this organization is impossible." of course, any idea or resolution requires the approval of all five permanent members of the Council, " said the Secretary General. On 5 September, the head of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko, echoing Western patrons, said that depriving Russia of the right of veto in the UN security Council will make it more effective. Eleven August, the head of the Ministry of foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation S. Lavrov Century said that the idea of Britain and France on the limitation or cancellation in part of the cases, the right of veto in the UN security Council have no serious prospects. In July, Russia has blocked the UN Security Council a draft decision on the establishment of the international Tribunal for the trial of blame for the Downing of the Malaysian airliner MH17 in Eastern Ukraine. The issue of reforming the UN Security Council periodically put politicians in the last few years. For example, from Paris supports the proposal to limit the veto power of the permanent members of the UN in consideration of the problems. The initiative to voluntarily limit the use of the veto expressed in 2013 the head of the French Republic Francois Hollande. European country is a permanent member of the Security Council, along With Russia, Britain, China and the USA. We emphasize that the Russian Federation is in the question of UN reform on the side of caution, refusing to discuss issues, but fundamentally speaking against the abolition of the veto.
sections: Politics |