The court explained why you want to block Telegram
The messenger Telegram shall be subject to immediate lock on the territory of the Russian Federation, as its use increases the probability of the cast to " substantial violations of constitutional rights of personal data subjects ", according to the decision of Tagansky court of the capital of Russia.
the verdict also says the app can "cause great harm to public and private interests," and the Firm "is obliged to fulfill under the legislative act the obligation" to disclose information to state authorities.
The court also noticed that side protection did not present evidence that the transfer of access keys to decrypt messages from a technical point of view. The court's decision
before the Court satisfied the claim of Roscomnadzor to block the messenger in Russia. It is the failure of the Telegram to provide the encryption keys of the FSB.
The office was allowed to give a Decision on the claim to be executed immediately, without waiting for appeal. The court has already sent to the Ministry decree about blocking messenger. The Ministry plans to start this procedure immediately.
Lawyers Telegram the meeting did not appear. According to their statements, Durov forbade them " to legitimize outright farce with my presence ".
As emphasized by the lawyers in preparation for trial, the judge made a " procedural violation ". According to their statements, the organization was not provided with the claim of Roskomnadzor, depriving me of an opportunity to present objections to it and your confirmation. The court dismissed the petition. The essence of claims to Telegram
Roskomnadzor has filed a lawsuit to block Telegram on the sixth of April. The Ministry was asked to immediately put this measure in execution if you win.
for reviews of Roskomnadzor, the actions of the messenger threatened the interests of Russia and its people, As the Telegram can contain information about terrorist organizations. Currently, FSB has the necessary information to decode the users ' messages.
The protection organization States that the requirement to provide encryption keys are impossible for technical reasons