Order Russia to the expansion of the Arctic shelf will be satisfied, if not tamper with the political moment. This belief was expressed by the adept of the Russian President for international cooperation in the Arctic and Antarctic Arthur Chilingarov.
Arthur Chilingarov no doubt that the UN decides to join Russia fresh Arctic lands. According to the version of the adept of the President of Russia, our country has prepared too strong application and the only point that may prevent the UN to decide in favor of Russia, is the political situation in the world.
"The application has been prepared at a fairly high level, in a long and painstaking work involved Committee and the Ministry of environment. Passed the expedition, collected vast confirmation. I think that application is successful, when will not interfere with political factors. You represent, what is the political situation", - quotes Chilingarov RIA Novosti.
He added that he hoped that the decision by the Russian proposal will be taken out of the context of political pressure on Russia. "There's a man sitting, experts, far from politics. In the moment we were comments, we 1 times represented the application. In our opinion, we have arranged things in order to argue the application, and then, God willing, everything will be fine," said the adept of the President of Russia.
As we were informed Days.Roux, earlier hope for the triumph of the Russian proposal on the Arctic shelf was expressed by the Minister of foreign Affairs of Russia Sergey Lavrov. "To date, assembled a vast array of additional scientific data in support of the Russian proposal, the process ends. A study by the Commission of the application and training it takes sometimes up to 5 years. Taking into account the excellent quality irrefutable base of the Russian proposal, there is every reason to believe that it has a greater chance of triumph", - said the head of the Foreign Ministry. Note that Russia has already been applied to the area of the Arctic shelf in 2001, but was refused. Then the UN Commission explained its flawed evidence.
sections: Politics, Accidents |