The reversal of the USA to the East will not return them to the position of "irreplaceable player in the Asian region, even if it will be successful, writes, noting that in "private conversations" most allow yourself to harsh criticism of U.S. policy in Asia.
printed illustrated edition reminds us that we are talking about a policy of "rebalancing" in relations between the U.S. and China was during the first presidential term of Barack Hussein Obama, when the Obama administration realized that North America have the "advantage" of influence in the European Union and "underweight" influence in Asia, but most of the until now not literally you understand, what exactly is this policy.
For this reason, most feel that The National Interest is characterized as a " crisis of inflated expectations ". For example, writes printed illustrated edition, it is important to understand that North America will not be able to restore its influence in the region at the level which it had reached before.
in addition, the Turn to the East means that, focusing on China, U.S. to a lesser extent will affect events in the European Union and the middle East. Washington recognized that experiences a "preponderance" of influence in these regions, however, about the fact that they are the U.S. is no longer important, it was not, says The National Interest, noting that the events in Ukraine, in the Syrian Arab Republic and Iraq one way or another "distract" US from Asia.
sections: Politics |