The readers of one of Germany's largest Newspapers are dissatisfied with the policy of the West towards Russia in the context of the fall of the Syrian and its possible solution.
"Supporters of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad see with Russian leader Vladimir Putin a deliverer from the Syrian civil war. The West takes the opposite position. Not every reader is like SZ, " writes the magazine before review six lead users to several articles related To possible intensification of Russian involvement in the Syrian conflict, as well as possible joint actions of the Russian Federation and the USA to resolve it
Reader Bruno Fischer from Cologne criticizes one of the newspaper articles. In his view, in the perception of the Syrian conflict there are double standards: the participation of Russia in events in the middle East is considered unacceptable, and at the same time, the participation of the United States is literally more.
Fischer asks the question: what is the meaning of the coalition against the "Islamic country" if the militants of this group were able, according to his application, with the help of a few hundred people to win this big city, like Mosul." instead of having to work together With Putin, the coalition solves an interesting problem - how to explain to the astonished audience that the IG has until now Not been destroyed, although against him (allegedly) fighting 30% of the planet, " concludes the Reader.
Reader r?diger Berger from the city of Neubiberg also criticized one of the articles from the s?ddeutsche Zeitung, in which Vladimir Putin and Bashar Assad are called " unpredictable "." The same is true of the reverse, " he writes. From the perspective of Berger, it is Clear that the presidents of both countries play a major role on security issues. The U.S. wants to eliminate Assad and make Syria their vassal and to eliminate the last Russian base in the Mediterranean." The result of this proxy war, the US will be the destruction of Syria, but what does it matter? Because the consequences need to deal with the Europeans, " says Berger.
Reader Dieter Eiermann from the city Mullheim believes that the situation in the middle East specifically linked to the West to destabilize Europe." it is useful to ask yourself the questions to understand who will benefit from the following: the destabilization of the Middle East and Libya through the destruction of the operating modes with the aid of outright lies (weapons of mass destruction in Iraq)