The action on "blockade" of Crimea from Ukraine can be considered failed because it has not achieved its objective, said on Thursday Deputy Prime Minister of the Republic Ruslan Balbec.
"Clearly any effective measures this action had no effect. Declared the goals pursued by the organizers of this promotion has not been reached. At this time the supply of Crimea products in practice is completely at the expense of Russia ", - said the news Agency Balbec.
Speaking About the deputies of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Mustafa the Dzhemilev and Refat Chubarov, the who became initiators of the action, Deputy Chairman of the Crimean government said that " these citizens have no influence neither in Crimea nor in Ukraine. This is a common political jesters, which uses the Pro-American government that came to power in Ukraine. They are used as an international provocateurs in the eyes of the public to justify unreasonable actions of the government of Ukraine ". However, the Deputy head of the Ministry of industry and trade Viktor Yevtukhov said that the Ministry sees no issues with food security of the Crimea because of the " blockade ", RIA " Novosti ". The so-called food blockade of the Crimea activists led by people's Deputy of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Mustafa Dzhemilev, leader of Crimean Tatars in Ukraine Refat Chubarov and joined them "the Right sector**" went in on Sunday, limiting the document for access of trucks with goods through border checkpoints. The Ukrainian head Petro Poroshenko called the goal "food blockade" of the Crimea. According to his statement, This is done for an early resumption of state sovereignty over the Crimea ". The head of the Crimea Sergey Aksenov gave a comparison of Ukraine declared a blockade of the Peninsula with a Comedy film, because the goods from it is in the Russian region not more than 5% of the market. According to Aksyonov, So-called food blockade of the Crimea will lead to the fact that for the past 2 weeks, the Ukrainian goods will be completely displaced from the Crimean market.
* The organisation against which the court accepted entered into legal force of the conclusion About destruction or ban the activities on the grounds stipulated by the Federal law "On countering extremist activity"