Electronic fuse of a rocket complex "Buk-M1" toils not, as suggested by the Dutch Commission on the collapse of the Malaysian Boeing, for that reason, her version of the cause of the crash is incorrect, said Deputy head of Federal air transport Agency, Oleg Storchevoy.
"The peculiarity is that the Electronic fuse of this rocket works not so, as suggested by the Dutch side. Our Experts have convincingly proved that if the story is about missile SAM " Buk-M1 ", then She went on a collision course, had no opportunity to inflict such damage to aircraft. She was obliged to fly for another five to seven meters ahead - so algorithm in the Fuze, "said Storchevoy, RIA "news" referring to television channel " Russia-24 ". He once again drew the attention that due to the illogical conclusions of the Dutch side at the moment cannot claim that MH17 was shot down by a Buk. Simultaneously, the research work of the experts of the company developing the missile defense concern "Almaz-Antey" have demonstrated that if the missile SAM "Buk-M1" was running, it could occur only from the area of the village zaroshchens'ke, controlled by Ukrainian security forces." Experts of "Almaz-Antey" calculated the point of detonation of the warhead, here was built the angle of approach of the rocket, and this data was used to calculate the trajectory and possible site of start. They showed that if the plane was shot down by a missile " Buk " version presented the Dutch side, then It could only be run from near the village of zaroshchens'ke ", - noted the Deputy head of the Federal air transport Agency. The day before Storchevoy said that the security Council of the Netherlands to confirm the findings in the report about the crash of Boeing made the calculations, according to which in the incident were involved, the warhead and missile types.
remember, the head of the security Council of the Netherlands, Tjibbe Joustra, introducing the report on the causes of the disaster Malaysian Boeing in Ukraine, said that the plane was shot down by a missile Buk missile system, equipped with combat part NM. Additionally, the said warhead equipped missiles only modification MM. These findings do not coincide with the presented expert report " Almaz-Antey ", as saying that the plane was shot down over the old variant missiles, which is not in service with the Russian army. Joustra Also said that Kiev was not able to adequately assess risks for civil aviation. Also, according to his statement, the Boeing rocket was fired from Eastern Ukraine, While He showed who controlled this territory. In the comments of Russia to the document indicates that the report of the security Council of the Netherlands on the collapse of the Malaysian Boeing not to say that the plane was shot out of controlled militia district. The Prosecutor's office of the Netherlands said that the proceedings of the disaster Boeing in Ukraine is not over and will continue in 2016. In the leadership of the Russian Federation has told that the report of the Netherlands on the crash of Boeing MH17 in Ukraine cannot be called objective, since the Russian side was not involved in the investigation. Deputy head of Federal air transport Agency, Oleg Storchevoy on Wednesday said that the Russian Federation fundamentally disagrees with the conclusions of the report of the security Council of the Netherlands on the crash of Boeing in Ukraine, the level of irrationality in the report outrageous.