<a href=NEWS.rin.ru'><a href=NEWS.rin.ru'> NEWS.rin.ru 
19 of June, 09:04

China accused the US of waging a trade war The Ministry of Commerce of China responded to the danger of the US capital to impose fresh duties on Chinese goods.

first head of the United States Donald trump was asked to prepare a list of Chinese items in the amount of 200 billion dollars for the possible introduction of additional charges at ten %, if Beijing will continue to raise duties on American products.

in handling the Chinese Ministry reported that the outbreak of the war, the violation of market rules are detrimental to the interests not only of both countries but also all people of the world. At the end of March Donald trump has signed a Memorandum "On the battle against the economic aggression of China" which gives the possibility to introduce limits on the products manufactured in China.

later, the United States has published a list of 1, 3 thousand Chinese items against which have the opportunity to impose import duties. So Washington wants to cross the billion-dollar trade shortfall with China. According to estimates of the us administration, China will lose out on new fees to about $ 50 billion each year.

in response to that China imposed duties on U.S. 128 items later, Beijing decided to distribute the fees for another 106 items from the United States. The timing of the introduction of trade measures depends on when the United States authorities announced the introduction of its restrictions on goods from China. In may, the parties agreed to take effective measures to reduce the deficit of the balance of U.S. trade with China, greatly increase the export of items and services USA to China, not to trade war and stop the imposition of trade duties.

But then the White house promised in June to announce the final list of items from China, which are dutiable at 25 %. The tariffs will take effect shortly after the publication of the list.

Of Commerce of the PRC in response expressed surprise and told that the message of the US capital is fundamentally contrary to the agreement.

sections: Politics

    Copyright © RIN 2005-