The COP did not want to consider the complaint of the head ozpp to the annexation of Crimea

The Russian constitutional Court refused to accept for consideration the complaint of the society for the protection of clients 'rights (ozpp) Russia Mikhail Anshakov to the provisions of the law" About acceptance to the Russian Federation Republic of Crimea and education of the Russian Federation new subjects ? Republic of Crimea and the Federal city of Sevastopol ".
"The constitutional Court of Russia, having studied the materials, does not find grounds for making the complaint for consideration ", ? reported in the text of choice on the Internet office of the constitutional court of Russia. In the definition it is noted that the finding of the Crimea and Sevastopol from Russia is not consistent with the competence of the Court.
"Formally challenging the provisions of the Federal constitutional law" About acceptance to the Russian Federation Republic of Crimea and education of the Russian Federation new subjects ? Republic of Crimea and the Federal city of Sevastopol ", the applicants in fact raise a question About the verification of constitutionality of provisions of article 65 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation On the presence of the Russian Federation the Republic of Crimea ", ? reported in the definition." Raising the issue before the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is not consistent with arising from the Constitution and enshrined in article 3 of the Federal constitutional law "On the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation" his competence as a body, allowing the supremacy and direct effect of the Constitution of the Russian Federation throughout its territory ", ? emphasizes the COP." The definition of the constitutional Court of Russia on the complaint is final and not appealable ", ? according to the document. On 1 July the constitutional Court of Russia stated that it had registered a complaint ozpp to the law On the reunification of Crimea with Russia. Later in ozpp explained that Mikhail Anshakov has filed a complaint as an individual, this initiative has no relationship to the company. Remember, in June ozpp published a provocative reminder for Residents of Russia going into Crimea. It reports: "Russian tourist organization, usually do not lead to consumers complete and accurate information About any problems that are able to arise for the tourists When visiting the occupied territories, as expressed more interest in selling tourism products ". The following are tips, for example: "If you need to visit the Peninsula of Crimea should not break the law of Ukraine and obtain permission from the Ukrainian border service, crossing the Russian-Ukrainian border through the checkpoint in the Kherson region ". Leader Vladimir Putin called the councils of the Society for the protection of the rights of customers "Public supervision" (ozpp) concerning Crimea does not care About Russian citizens, and serving the interests of foreign countries. Explaining the memo ozpp, the President's press Secretary Dmitry Peskov said that the recommendation to Russian tourists in front of the entrance to the Crimea to get the permission of the Kiev authorities, absurd, as this region is part of Russia.


sections: Politics