The Sueddeutsche Zeitung readers resented the policy of the West regarding Russia
The readers of one of Germany's largest Newspapers Sueddeutsche Zeitung dissatisfied with the attitude of the West towards Russia in the context of the fall of the Syrian and its possible solution. "Supporters of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad see with Russian leader Vladimir Putin Redeemer Syria from the civil war. The West held the opposite position. Not every reader SZ is like "? says the magazine before to lead six comments of users to several articles related To possible increased Russian involvement in the Syrian conflict, as well as possible joint actions of Russia and the USA to resolve, reports RIA " Novosti ". Reader Bruno Fischer from Cologne criticizes one of the articles from the newspaper. In his view, in the perception of the Syrian conflict double standard at work: the participation of Russia in the events in the middle East is considered invalid, and at the same time, the participation of the United States ? is literally more. Fischer asks the question: what is the meaning of the coalition against the " Islamic countries ", if the operatives were able, according to his statement, with a few hundred people to win such a large city like Mosul." instead of to work together With Putin, the coalition decides entertaining task ? how to explain to the astonished audience that the is until now Not destroyed, although against him (allegedly) fighting 30% of the planet, " ? sums up the Reader. Reader r?diger Berger from the city of Neubiberg also criticized one of the articles Sueddeutsche Zeitung, in which Vladimir Putin and Bashar al-Assad called " unpredictable "." Same is true of the opposite " ? he writes. From the perspective of Berger, it is Clear that the presidents of both countries play a major role on security matters. The U.S. wants to eliminate the Assad government, to make Syria their vassal and eliminate the last Russian base in the Mediterranean." The result of this proxy war, the US will be the destruction of Syria, but what does it matter? The consequences because it will be necessary to understand the Europeans ", ? Berger believes. Reader Dieter Eiermann from the city Mullheim believes that the situation in the middle East specifically linked to the West to destabilize Europe." it is useful to ask yourself questions to understand who benefits from the following: the destabilization of the Middle East and Libya through destruction, operating modes, using outright lies (weapons of mass destruction in Iraq)