Analyst: NATO is still alive only because North America is necessary to fight against Russia
The inhabitants of Eastern Europe continue to "tell stories" about the good intentions of the American army and the need for protection of the East European region from " Russian aggression ", says the head of the analytical center of the Future of Freedom Foundation economist on the Internet organization.

The inhabitants of Eastern Europe continue to "tell stories" about the good intentions of the American army and the need for protection of the East European region from " Russian aggression ", says the head of the analytical center of the Future of Freedom Foundation economist on the Internet organization.
He stressed that the American print publication called "Dragoon walk" from the U.S. military March " good intentions ", although, according to the economist, arranging the passage of the American convoys in the territory of the Czech Republic, Washington shows Europeans that North America is ready to protect Eastern Europe from Russia's actions ".
anyway none of American Newspapers is not talking about the fact that excessive military ambitions of the Pentagon are the reason why Moscow is forced to carry out response actions, Hornberger writes. It was worth the cold war come to naught, as NATO immediately began to swallow Eastern European countries, keeping in mind the main goal - Ukraine, "capture" which would allow the U.S. to deploy military bases of the Russian borders. In the eyes of those who still believes in the infallibility of the U.S. military, Russia, of course, is the aggressor, but the origins of this conflict, the Europeans should be sought not in the capital of Russia.
"Let's face the truth. These people [the U.S. military] has no equal in the ability to provoke a crisis and immediately wash your hands. In reality, NATO should be dissolved with the end of the cold war. The Alliance was dissolved only because of the need to create endless pockets of tension with Russia so that the average American understood and shared the need to maintain bloated and outdated military of the US industry in its current form, " says the economist.
The March of a column of American military equipment in Eastern Europe, He says, is another evidence of how the "wing" of public security of the Federal government of America - most-influential - makes its own rules in matters of foreign policy.