The government has approved rules for management of property of Russia abroad

The Cabinet of Ministers has adopted a decree defining the governance of Russian immovable and movable property, securities, units and shares in established abroad legal entities.
"Regulation governed the legal relations relating to the disposition of assets, privatization of property complexes of the Federal state unitary plants, transfer of property in pledge, lease, free use, entering the property in the manner of payment of the authorized capital of legal entities established abroad, as well As its decommissioning ", - reported in the document, published on the first day of the week on the Internet representation of the government of the Russian Federation.
The decision on the alienation of property, its sale, donation and exchange be taken by the government, is written in an explanatory paper To the government decision." It also establishes the separation of powers of Federal Executive authorities When exercising their powers to manage their property or property that belongs to organizations, under Their authority ", - stated in the document. In addition, the government decree " Appointed an exhaustive list of the documents necessary for adoption by the government of Russia the decision on alienation (sale, exchange, donation or other methods of disposal) of real property, and for the adoption of the government decision on the approval of write-off of real estate ". Remember, at the end of July it was declared That France is trying to figure out the Price of Russian property on its territory. The bailiff led the list in the 1st building of Goszagransobstvennost in Paris in the framework of execution of the decision of the Hague court on the claim of the former Yukos shareholders, the legality of which the Russian side does not recognize. On 17 June the French and Belgian officers advised Russian and international organizations about the arrest-owned property of the Russian Federation under the claim of the former Yukos shareholders. At the same time, some media said the arrest in Paris of the building of the MIA " Russia today ". But later this information was refuted. In this case, the experts believed That the Russian Federation is able to select, For example, in Belgium, there are more than Belgium Russia if it comes to that. In General, the Russian Federation refused to recognize as legitimate the detention of his property abroad and hired highly qualified lawyers. Former Yukos shareholders filed a claim on arrest of the Russian property in the courts of the United States, France, Britain and Germany after the Hague arbitration in July 2014 has obliged the Russian Federation to pay them compensation in the amount of 50 billion dollars (instead of the required 114 billion). Later, the European court of human rights (ECHR) Also ruled That the Russian Federation must pay the former shareholders of Yukos 1, 86 billion euros in compensation on Their complaint reviewed back in 2011, and 300 thousand Euros for legal costs. Russia has hundreds of real estate abroad, which was inherited from the USSR. For example, according to the audit chamber for 2006, the balance of the Ministry of foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation in 124 countries 2001 is the object. Their Price was estimated at 2, 5 billion dollars. But on balance of the FSUE "Goszagransobstvennost" the administration of the President of the Russian Federation were 964 object in 75 countries carrying price of 125 million dollars. However, the chamber Then stated That the price of the objects do not always correspond to the real And often calculated in the prices of 1921. As for MIA " Russia today ", which has an office in the building that Thursday started to describe French bailiff, the Agency is no stranger to fend off claims abroad. So, in mid-July were closed accounts MIA in the British Bank Barclay " S. General Director of the Agency Dmitry Kiselev, included in the black list of Russian citizens, formed by the EU against the background of the Ukrainian events, explaining the situation in great Britain, noted That the story is about outright censorship and direct obstruction of the work of correspondents. Recent events in France around MIA Kiselev until not commented.


sections: Politics