The United States continues to claim the need for regime change in Syria, also with the participation of international players, even Americans themselves. In this position, however, fully contradicts the Geneva communiqué, under which the signature was put and Washington, reminded in the Ministry of foreign Affairs of Russia. The unstable political situation in several countries in the Middle East, which led to the unsafe origin of international terrorist groups and large flows of refugees, pouring into Europe, has been ongoing for a couple of years. The case, for example, about Syria. To develop a single solution all major political forces to address this situation a difficult to start because of our position today and was unable to decide the United States. "Our American colleagues must still make their choice with what they do. For 4 and a half years 1 time to clearly present the vision for their own participation in the events", - quotes RIA Novosti adept official of the Ministry of foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Maria Zakharova. "If the United States is still committed to the Geneva communiqué, which was supported by all international and Association which they signed, how can the General Assembly, as we are informed by the media, to talk about the proposal of some of the figures and concepts of the shift of power," she said. However, a similar assumption is not so obvious. So, even the American side signed the document "specifically States that the political future of Syria should characterize the Syrians themselves". However, Washington's actions in the region say that American politicians see an opportunity to influence the future configuration of the Syrian regime. "Then, probably, it is necessary for our American colleagues to announce that they were withdrawing their own signature on the Geneva communiqué... But if they still withdrew his own signature and to this day claim that they are committed to this document, any simulation of development scenarios and its actual implementation. Otherwise they are cheating us all" - said Maria Zakharova. With all of this to say about the successful struggle of the United States with terrorists in the middle East. "Sadly, we continue to see that across the coalition, with the stated purpose of combating ISIL in fact, this struggle isn't real and full. Knowing about the location of militants, getting data on the ground, the blows are not applied. Data we have," said the official dealer of the foreign Ministry. "Among other things, we see information about what is ongoing supply of weapons through various channels like the moderate opposition. But I think the actual question here is this flirting that there are good terrorists and bad terrorists, moderate and immoderate opposition - this logic yourself totally exhausted", she concluded.