First, the news. This week advanced Denmark shocked the letter one of the most famous people of the state about the fact That she wants to settle scores with life. Writer, singer And blogger Fi Lorsen, which is presumably signed by 7 % of the Danish subjects, said she never could. The Danish government responded immediately, And the Kingdom is waiting for a big change. Important nuance. Fi Lorsen - influential celebrity of the new type. She's 23, she's behind a seven-year experience of fame, a few singles And a couple of books, But she became famous Not singing And Not writing. Just in the distant 2012, fifteen Fi appeared on Letterman And told how she was bullied in school facility (as later turned out - was lying). Bullying was then a fresh hot topic, And a girl has become an iconic character of public discussion. Lorsen immediately start a blog about fashion, who immediately began to read girls from eight To twelve years, And went through the hands of TV execs who decorated her reality show. Even then she did coming out as bisexual (as stated by friends lied). Then steadily came the singles, And also an autobiographical book about how hard Fi struggles to retain popularity. No trace education of the girl we could Not be happened. in General, Not a hero or a genius. But something like a mushroom, hatched at the intersection of social networks And the media. Times a day pictures on Insta, a couple Times a week vidosic on YouTube Once a week airwaves. Once a month any exploits to the tabloids (in 2016 Phi, for example, rescued from Romanian streets And adopted 2 doggies). Every six months - up And fresh novels. Once a year an album every two years is a scandal. Under This podderzhivaetsya advertising any devochkoy junk, cryptocurrency And hot tours. Just like everyone else. It is clear, And the recording of "goodbye cruel world" was yet another planning mess (of Course And luckily, blogger And didn't think really samoubivatsya). So: Fi again All failed. Girls-subscribers will have thrown it dozens of thousand of likes, And the media responded to hurricane publicity. And then the leadership of the state realized That there is something wrong. The Danish government suddenly found: any a loser, got on the palm of fame, maybe this place is stupid for commercial purposes PR suicide among hundreds of thousand of young girls And for That misunderstanding, nothing will. in General, the head of the Ministry of education had spoken with the proposal to impose liability on bloggers with a certain number of subscribers. The majority of the public supported the Minister, a part - said That the responsibility must divide And social platforms (instagram, YouTube, Facebook, And others). Currently, the debate is in full swing, Fi removed provisevshy two days post And pretends That he is being treated for depression. In the end, Perhaps the law on the bloggers And the truth will arise - in this form or another. What's interesting to Us. For obvious reasons, the Danish situation does Not differ neither from Russian, nor from the Australian or Brazilian. Around the globe the explosion of social media has created the problem of " role models nowhere ", Not cramped neither moral nor criminal responsibility. Not that Before the rise of social networks did Not appear stupid sheep of both sexes fed the masses a bad example. The children of the rich glowed in the scandalous chronicle, intriguing the public with partying And debauchery. The stars of show business, talking shit From the stage And died from overdoses. But only a new reality has opened the route first, people do Not have the asset of Any merits at all to anyone - neither his nor the family. And secondly, it gave them the opportunity to speak continuously from the first person, proud And blasphemous, hundreds of thousand And millions of his contemporaries. Its causing harm to their finances And health. We have the latest high-profile example of this kind was, it seems, not clearly whence got out instabloggers Lena fake diplomas And modeling pics chopping up two hundred thousand Podeschi as " nutritionist And biochemist ". Before she noticed the Commission of RAS on pseudoscience for years to sell to his audience in the monstrous doses (20-25 pills a day. The more subscribers will use promo codes, the greater the percentage will be given to instablogs. Simple math). Instabloggers eventually exposed, about It wrote mass-media, But as it turned out, didn't change anything whatsoever. I Now checked: the "biochemist Lena," All right. Of podeschi 300 thousand, And it is as if nothing had happened continues to sell them " pills according to the scheme ". But there are also dozens, if Not hundreds of similar. And those who did Not prescribe pills, promoting, for example, the financial pyramid (how many of our bloggers have earned on advertising of cerberi?) Speculators and invest-program, helping crowds of Residents uhnut into the debt pit. ... Attention to the question. What do the state - any state - when faced with this army of greedy sheep (sheep disguised And cynical predators)? Sooner or later every country will reach That Subversion Is Not only overt propaganda of terrorism, drug addiction, suicide And hatred. It's Just unfiltered And livelihoods of celebrities with zero social responsibility aimed at public relations And profit. The scale of the harm these citizens, as long as not obvious, But This is the first public scandal, which often bursts out After a tragedy. And, alas, with the current trends It's likely a matter of time. So: What the state wants to fulfill its obligation to protect Residents from threats as well, And those That are born in their midst? What state, if any "exposure" do Not harm the media parasites? The answer in General is evident: however to bring them under the iron umbrella of the criminal code. Now or in ten years, But the state will have to introduce a kind of " weblog licensing activities." All prohibitions And restrictions That are currently in other professions And businesses. in Denmark, for example, there has been an argument about What commercial blogging is minor, really, child labour And therefore must be severely limited. ... Of course, do "influencer" will resolutely resist attempts to put on a legislative muzzle on their freedom of expression. Us And Not only Us - waiting for the collective hysteria about the stifling of freedom of speech And cries of " well, of course, bloggers have the main enemies, have fought with illegal activities of officials And the slaughter of dolphins." But the choice before the government is simple. Or to act as a " Strangler ", Or to give society the prey of the sheep. <span style="color:darkgray