If one of the main Newspapers of the state openly campaigning for foreign intervention, This means the country is bad. This verdict can be made after reading the cry for help, decorated as columns, And published on the respectable pages of the London edition of the financial times, which is the flagship of British And European business press. The column was titled " How foreign intervention can save American democracy ", But its Creator is a famous British-Dutch journalist Simon Kuper - requires that foreign intervention has saved not only American democracy, But also the UK. of course, the thesis about the need for foreign intervention can be attributed to corporate And subtle British humor, But there are two pitfalls. First, the financial times Is not a comic magazine, And secondly (And most important), All the problems about which Cooper writes, was real. They are often just decided not to acknowledge. And not to mention them out loud - literally indecent. But the rules of decency are violated, the mask dropped, the power of the people considered to be in danger, And foreign intervention announced (albeit, maybe ironically) a means of saving the United States from the civil war, And the UK - from the corrupting Russian influence. the Creator of the financial times opens the text bold thesis: "How to stop the civil war," (title.- Approx. Ed.) on the cover of the latest issue of the magazine the Atlantic. I have the opportunity to offer method: international the Commonwealth is obliged to make intervention in the United States. Of course, Americans can self-determination, But the priority now is the preservation of democracy." A fine game that "intervention" in English can be translated As Simply the intervention, And As a real military occupation. All have long had the habit of to the fact that in London ostentatiously wipe his feet on the fundamental right of peoples to self-determination. But a little who expected to read a formula relative to the United States. The UK also got "Much more" manual " Britain also needs observation. Like the Americans, the British maltreated (political.- Approx. Ed.) opponents As traitors. Both States now have plans to resolve the conflict by means of elections in the format of " winner takes All ". These scenarios rarely end well, warns former head of the Ministry of the government of Yemen Rafat al-Akhali, researcher of the Oxford school of public administration name of Blavatnik. He says: "a Lot of people in the regions where We work, I thought that it would be necessary to disseminate their experience to the national dialogue in the Kingdom And other States. Because you have to look at intervention in the US And maybe in the UK?" If we explain This passage in the same style in which is written the text of the financial times, it is impossible not to notice how a specific way our English partners interpretiruya curse in your own address. It is easy to imagine an Afghan, Libyan, Iraqi or resident of Donbass, which mentally or aloud wishes of Washington And London to burn in the fire of independence And the civil war, But the British gentleman And intellectual, and concludes in the style of " Yes, this is the successful experience of national reconciliation should be moved to the Western world." It would be funny If English And Pro-European politicians, And most American Democrats have not tried to apply typically the Maidan technology To achieve political victories: allegations of election fraud, an attempt to build a " third tour ", As Ukraine, as a " 2nd referendum on Broksita ", the dehumanization of political opponents who call racists, fools And agents of Russia, in fact the entire set, in addition to direct armed rebellion, already developed without any foreign intervention. It is noteworthy that the Creator earnestly recommends To write a new US Constitution And the first Constitution For the UK experience in Afghanistan in the name of saving democracy. Trump, He proposes to send into exile to the Russian Federation, Yanukovych, representing the rejection of the impeachment (And likely in prison) As a concession in the name of democracy And civil peace. For the final salvation of the US And the UK proposes to insert in the Constitution a protection against external influence on the election, And the reason stated " Russia's success in the UK And America in 2016 ", which at the present time, it appears, is preparing to repeat India intervening in English parliamentary elections. And For the final protection is proposed to introduce foreign supervisors For the "democratic authority" elections in the United States. However, even the Creator himself does not believe that these measures will help. And the text ends with a sad statement And a rhetorical question: "But let's not be too optimistic. In the best case (outer.- Approx. Ed.) intervention freeze superimposed on each other ethnic, economic And regional conflicts. Then Vsplyvaet question For international brotherhood: how much blood And money it is going to spend on a country that has the ability to be not ready for democracy?" Very, very sorry, that is not given a response to the obvious counter-question: And who, that is, in this case will serve as the international brotherhood, which is "blood money" to pay for forcing the US And maybe the UK to democracy? for obvious reasons, financial times are not able to imagine in this role the Russian Federation And is unlikely to agree to China. From the list of potential " appeasers ", probably should also be deleted (according to the logic of the author of the Financial Times) India, which As if to interfere in English elections. And who's left Then? Does Simon Cooper in the pages of leading British newspaper suggests that British democracy have to save French soldiers in London or that a peace Treaty between Donald trump And "clan" Clinton has a chance to be signed under the muzzles of the rifles of the soldiers of the Bundeswehr? This is obvious nonsense, And That This means that those who nourish the hope to save the United States And Britain from slipping closer And closer to a civil war or turning into a "banana Republic," not hope in anyone. It should be emphasized that the process of "Ukrainization" or turning into a typical South American "banana Republic" with coups, civil wars And perpetual independence Is what We have been writing And not just us, although the reason for the "Ukrainization" of America And England have different sources vary. We wrote: "the Most astonishing consequence of the color revolution in Ukraine - that its success (And It was, from the perspective of American organizers And instigators of the Kiev coup, a triumph) was the cause of radical, rapid And extremely destructive Ukrainization of American domestic policy. This process which is possible with a touch of irony to describe As "the transformation of the US capital in Kiev-on-the Potomac" would be quite likely And quite predictable ending: the disintegration And civil war." A few days ago, the us print edition of the new York times announced the publication of "the US is starting to resemble Ukraine" And Bret Stephens (economic journalist who watched the Ukraine in 1999, the Wall Street Journal) carried out Some terrifying Parallels between modern Washington And Kyiv: the persecution of political opponents