Young heterosexual men often perceive sex not as a source of pleasure but as a zone of anxiety and heightened responsibility. This was the conclusion of the authors of a study published in the Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. They conducted in-depth interviews with 31 men aged 18 to 32 who grew up in an era of active discussion of sexual consent.

Consent is a mutual voluntary decision by partners to engage in sexual intimacy. Over the past decade, the model of "affirmative consent" has spread in a number of countries: it must be active and continue throughout the entire encounter, rather than simply being the absence of the word "no." Many of those interviewed had absorbed these rules but encountered difficulties in practice.

Participants said they constantly monitor their partner's reaction and evaluate their every move. One 28-year-old man compared it to defusing a bomb: "You don't know which wire to cut." The two youngest participants admitted that fear overrides the joy of intimacy. Many also mentioned anxiety about a possible inability to satisfy their partner.

The researchers identified three main themes. The first is high anxiety and vigilance: 29 of 31 participants (94%) described sex as a situation requiring constant control. The second is deep moral concern about not causing harm: the same number of men emphasized that they want to be decent and ethical partners and feared accidentally offending or coercing a woman. The third is fear of disgrace and of life being ruined: 26 people (84%) spoke of fear of accusations, and 19 (61%) of possible legal consequences up to and including prison. Another 16 of the 31 men (52%) turned harsh judgment on themselves: instead of guilt for a specific act, they felt a persistent sense of shame - "I am a bad person."

The authors note that these fears may be exaggerated. False accusations of sexual violence do occur, but according to police and court reviews they are extremely rare - far rarer than participants assumed. At the same time, many men did not dare discuss their doubts with friends or relatives, fearing that any admission of imperfection would be taken as an admission of a tendency toward violence.

The study is qualitative, that is, based on in-depth interviews rather than statistical measurement. Its results cannot be generalized to all young men. The sample is small (31 people), most studied at one Australian university and grew up in Judeo-Christian families. In addition, four of the seven interview questions concerned ambiguous or non-consensual situations, which may have directed participants' attention to negative experiences. Lead author Jossy Forrest of the University of Melbourne emphasizes: the goal was not to excuse men but to understand them in order to prevent sexual violence. "Young men deserve to be heard," the researchers conclude.

Source: PsyPost