Premature elections, which were held in several regions of the Russian Federation, did not help the governors to advance in rating performance. The 7 governors of the 30 marked negative dynamics. The Foundation of civil society (Fargo) is the performance rating of the governors, the main point where we were held in the Russian Federation elections. Those governors who have successfully held their own election campaign, ranking strengthened. The leaders of the regions that have either eliminated their own rivals from the opposition, or had unreasonably high level of premature voting, in contrast, positions in the rating lost. With all this, the most inefficient civil servants are the first candidates for retirement. In the first group of successful governors included 22 people. It remained almost constant. 1st and 2nd place was taken by the leaders of the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug and the Kaluga region, reported the "news". Also, the most stable result of all shows the head of the Chechen Republic Ramzan Kadyrov. With eighth place, which he held in the first ratings of Fargo, Kadyrov has risen to sixth, which is not inferior to anyone. In the top-10 again proved to be the mayor of Moscow Sergey Sobyanin. "Sobyanin successfully held elections to the city Duma of Moscow", - told the head of the Center for regional studies, Fargo Vitaly Ivanov. Overall, 22 of the Governor demonstrated to work successfully and proved their own professional competence. In the group rating of "below average" was the Governor of the Kaliningrad region Nikolai Tsukanov, which sank on the 4th position. "This time the premise of the fall were the evaluation of experts, who directed attention to the difficulty of enforcement in the sphere of decrees and orders of the President of Russia and the deterioration of the ratio between earnings and the cost of the natives," said the experts. Himself Tsukanov said that will correct their own work after reviewing the results of the comparison of the performance of work. "To explain what the ratings are useless. 10s ratings are somehow on a specific methodology. Alas, I am with this methodology is unknown. Because I just read this rating and make specific findings that are likely to adjust in their own work. You just need to understand what effective signs are considered to be major. Certainly I want to say that the decrees of the President we all are, and I directly supervise their execution", - he stressed.