Russia won the 2nd place in the threats mentioned by Obama, declared Sergey Lavrov at the session of the UN General Assembly. According to him, the speech of the President of the United States peace failed. "With respect to the speech of the President of the United States, we were awarded 2nd place as a threat to international peace and security, " Lavrov said. - On the ground - the Ebola virus, the second "Russian aggression in Europe", now on the 3rd - IGIL and other terrorists," said the diplomat. "It seemed to me strange that the President of the United States a couple of times said that the world has become freer and safer, I didn't even know seriously if it tells you", - the Minister added. He also stressed the precedent that Obama's speech in UN peacekeeping did not. "This is an American view of the world that the President has told, repeatedly emphasizing his and his powers exclusivity. The look of power, which in his theory of the state security recorded their right, regardless of some of the decisions of the UN security Council and some other legal acts, to use the power at their discretion," said the politician. Speaking about the resolution of incidents Lavrov said that Moscow is interested in an equal dialogue, rather than through unilateral complaints. "We are interested in incidents around the world to extinguish, but not one-sided complaints and stall with unhealthy scalp healthy, and through fair, equitable and mutually respectful dialogue. I'm currently going to meet with John Kerry and tell him about it," the words of the head of the foreign Ministry, ITAR-TASS reported. Among other things, he mentioned the anti-punishment, declaring that this is a problem of the United States, and what is happening in Ukraine - the problem of Ukrainians: "Ukrainians met several times. They signed 2 of the document. The adepts of the OSCE and the Russian Federation could help to establish this conversation. Everything is written on paper in the Protocol and Memorandum, scrupulously to fulfill. Agreed by the Ukrainians themselves. To dictate any characteristics of the implementation of these agreements, most likely incorrect".