In the United States hosted a meeting of the UN Security Council devoted to the civil rights in North Korea. This question was included in the agenda after the vote, but some participants saw that it was not in the area of responsibility of the security Council. The UN Security Council, which met in new York for the first time decided to introduce relatively compliance with civil rights on the ground of the Korean people's Democratic Republic of Korea (DPRK). Solution conventionally this issue were taken by means of voting. To inquire about making this topic in the agenda of the security Council addressed 10 member countries: Australia, England, Jordan, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Rwanda, United States, France, Chile and South Korea. Moreover, against a similar initiative has dramatically made by China, which announced that this area is not located within the area of responsibility of the security Council, this position is also supported Russia. Due to the fact that opinions differed, it was decided to conduct the so-called "procedural vote", in which decisions are made by majority vote and not working right of veto. As a result, the introduction of a new item in the agenda of the spoke 11 States, we note that the aforementioned 10 joined Argentina, tells TASS. Votes "against" Russia and China, another 2 delegation - Nigeria and Chad abstained. Note that similar procedural votes are taken in the Security Council only rarely - the last time this happened in early September 2006, when the discussion was made to the situation in Myanmar. Then for the creation of a new agenda item voted 10 States, at the time as 4, including Russia and China, voted against it. To this day, the Security Council discussed the North Korean subjects exclusively in the context of nuclear and missile programs of North Korea. Note that in the studies in this field against North Korea were imposed punishment of the United Nations. Now, the organization concerned and civil rights, which in the opinion of some members, are not observed in areas of the DPRK. The UN often mentioned "virtually complete denial of the right to freedom of ideas, conscience and religion, and the right to freedom of opinion, expression, Assembly and Association", about serious violations of the right to freedom of maneuver, the choice of place of residence. Almost immediately after the report's publication Pyongyang has not recognized all the conclusions of the Commission, declaring that they fabricated "forces, aggressive attitude toward the DPRK". A number of Western States, as well as adherents of the United Nations, to consider these data as a set of evidence against the control of the DPRK, demanding to start their prosecution at the international level. In early December, these calls took more concrete form - the UN General Assembly by a majority vote adopted a resolution recommending that the Security Council send North Korea dossier on the discussion of the International criminal court (ICC) in the Hague, and still use "successful targeted sanctions against responsible for violations of human being on this planet. Days.Ru wrote that the North Korean leader Kim Jong UN want to be judged for crimes against humanity. International organization believes that they should be engaged in the international criminal court.The third Committee of the UN General Assembly recommended that the Security Council of the world organization to refer cases of alleged crimes against humanity in North Korea to the International criminal court (ICC) in the Hague. For example, the UN urged the Security Council to resolve the issue involving Kim Jong-UN's responsibility for the offense, flawless against humanity. In addition, the international community proposes to introduce a "special punishment" against those responsible for violation of civil rights in the DPRK.