Western powers almost always regarded the Crimea as strategically Central to personal military object, therefore, was directed to place on the Peninsula, under one or another pretext, personal base. The almost unanimous decision of the Crimean about reunification with Russia, which resulted in a referendum put an end to these encroachments and, together with this, gave Moscow an opportunity to place on the Peninsula personal nuclear weapons. A year later after the Crimean referendum voted in favor of joining Russia, many in the country, and appreciate all the undoubted improvement that continental has managed to bring on the Peninsula and on the contrary, thought - what other benefit from the presence in the composition of the Russian Crimea. The most undeniable and most painful for a number of Western States have had their own views on the future of the region - the use of the main strategic position of the Crimea for military advantage. It is, in addition to the rest, and on the ability of the deployment of nuclear weapons in the Crimea. "Of course, Russia has the right to deploy nuclear weapons on its own terrain, if he thinks it necessary, in any region. About the presence of nuclear weapons in the Crimea at the moment I don't know anything about the projects placing it there I don't know, but in principle the project believe that it is right, of course we have, although, of course, Kiev thinks differently" - quoted by RIA Novosti head of the Department for non-proliferation and arms control Ministry of foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Mikhail Ulyanov. In the Russian foreign Ministry also said that the situation around the Treaty on the elimination of intermediate-range and shorter-range was considerably more intense than it was previously. "It would be at least premature to declare that the contract is bursting at the seams, but the situation around him, naturally, significantly deteriorated," said Mikhail Ulyanov at a press conference in Moscow. On this occasion, Russia has a number of complaints to the United States. "We have at least 3 complaints to the United States for the execution of this agreement. The dialogue on this topic was. And I will not say that the answers that we were Americans, we were satisfied. Because, apparently, the dialogue will continue on this subject," the diplomat added. Together with this, in the current agenda is not the question of the establishment of a middle East zone, independent of weapons of mass destruction. "The purpose of the zone is not on the agenda today," said Mikhail Ulyanov.