The Ministry of internal Affairs of Ukraine created obstacles to productivity investigation of the events on Maidan, and coordinated communication policy between the investigating authorities did not exist, said the head of the international Advisory group Nicholas Bratz, introducing the Report on events on the Maidan.
"report of the international Advisory group is quite detailed and in it, the panel concludes that a certain understanding of the proceedings conducted at the national level, did not satisfy the requirements of the Convention.... Our group acknowledged the difficulties faced by the authorities soon began investigating in February of last year, "said Bratz, quoted by RIA" Novosti ".
"the report also Has a number of criticisms about the lack of productivity of the investigation. We believe that most importantly it is the result of a number of shortcomings with respect to personnel policies and adequate resources of the Prosecutor General, " said he." the impact of investigations on the Maidan from the perspective of an international Advisory group was mostly depended on close interaction between investigative agencies. The lack of such cooperation with the General Prosecutor's office 2 other authorities, who were involved in the investigation, from the perspective of our group had a very serious negative impact on the effectiveness of the proceedings. There is good reason to believe that the attitude of the Ministry of interior created obstacles... ?G came to the conclusion that there was no coordinated communication policy between the three investigative agencies to provide a single comprehensive information regarding the progress of the investigation in General, " said he. According to his statement, the General conclusion of an international Advisory group is that " was not much progress has been made in the investigation process "." MCG also does not believe that the information provided to the public was sufficient for the protection of the rights and desires of received damage and their families, " said Bratz." The possible existence of a third force was studied as the attorney General's office and the Ministry of the interior. We came to the conclusion that this question remains open... Because Ukrainian government itself said that there was not enough evidence to substantiate about the fact that snipers or third force were involved in massacres, " said Bratz. First, the General Prosecutor's office of Ukraine has established that snipers fired on Tuesday, the Ukrainian citizens. Remember, on 7 March, the EU officially called for the trial of crimes committed in Kiev. The Ministry of foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation has decided to address the OSCE and several other international agencies with documentary evidence of crimes committed on the Maidan and in General in Ukraine. Along with this constant authorized of Russia to the UN, Vitaly Churkin raised in the UN security Council topic of snipers shooting in Ukraine and also tried to convince to take proceedings. For example, he asked in a persistent form data to investigate about the fact that the shots were fired from the so-called office of the commandant of the Maidan Andriy Parubiy.


10px

sections: Politics