<a href=NEWS.rin.ru'><a href=NEWS.rin.ru'> NEWS.rin.ru 
30 of July, 19:01

Senator: version London Litvinenko strengthen anti-Russian hysteria
The version about involvement of Andrei Lugovoi and Dmitry Kovtun to the poisoning of ex-FSB officer Alexander Litvinenko was "pulled from a dusty Cabinet" to raise the degree of anti-Russian rhetoric, initiated by the statements made by the British authorities ' readiness to teach the Ukrainian military, according to the Federation Council.

law enforcement agencies London on Thursday concluded that Lugovoi and Kovtun poisoned Litvinenko, and left for the court to make its own conclusions about what stood behind this the Russian government.

"The version about involvement of Andrei Lugovoi and Dmitry Kovtun to the elimination of Alexander Litvinenko is pulled out from a dusty Cabinet, as the skeleton to raise the overall degree of anti-Russian rhetoric that is heating up and so is every day stronger and stronger," believes the member of the international Department of the Federation Council, a veteran of the foreign intelligence Service Igor Morozov.

review of Senator, the conclusion of Scotland Yard " is placed in one line and to the statements of the messenger of great Britain in the UN security Council of Russia belonging to the tragedy with the Malaysian Boeing.

"British intelligence agencies know that the organizer of murder of Litvinenko was Boris Berezovsky, but now He already passed away, and you can blame the other for the murder, without fear of revelations," - said Morozov.

He is convinced that the charges Lugovoi and Kovtun will be brought in the court before the end and then will follow a fairly stiff punishment against them." without doubt, we must assume the consequences for Russian Residents Lugovoi and Kovtun, for this reason, Russia should and will uphold the wishes of their Residents, " said Morozov. He stated that the Russian Federation is interested in the transparency of judicial proceedings, and the Commissioners of Scotland Yard must present clear evidence in support of their allegations, which were made in the process of open court hearings.

sections: Politics

    Copyright © RIN 2005-