To supply weapons to Ukraine, it means " to pour gasoline on the fire ": the problem of the South-East of Ukraine should not be solved by military means, the supply of arms will only help the growth of the civil war, said the head of the presidential Council for human rights (human rights Council Mikhail Fedotov, explaining the possibility of supplying weapons to the Ukraine, which now consider the United States.

the print edition of the new York times on the first day of the week said that after a series of serious defeats of the Ukrainian security forces in recent days, the administration of U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama again considering the question of military assistance. According to the publication, commander of NATO in the European Union, American General Philip Breedlove supports delivery Kyiv " weapons for defense and certain officials in the White house and Pentagon support this proposal. Obama himself in conversation broadcaster CN CN said that Washington will continue to provide cash assistance to the government of Ukraine and will strengthen diplomatic and economic pressure on the Russian Federation.

"in my opinion, to Put weapons on Ukraine - the same thing to pour gasoline on the fire. If the task is to grow a civil war in Ukraine - then of course, there should be weapons, But If America wants peace is something you can't do that, " said Fedotov Last news .

"Many times it was stated that the problem of Eastern Ukraine there is no military solution. But If she has no military solution, why it is necessary to Put armed?" - added the head of the HRC.

sections: Politics