<a href=NEWS.rin.ru'><a href=NEWS.rin.ru'> NEWS.rin.ru 
15 of February, 11:01

American expert: replace opinion about Russia Basic instinct politicians from America is cowardice, which finds its expression in all that relates to foreign policy, for this reason, the So-called anti-Russian consensus evolved and gained momentum in the absence of intellectual resistance, says the scientist, one of the founders edition of The American Conservative Scott Macconnell.
If European leaders have the opportunity to openly Express their concerns about the risks that carries the war within Europe, and to notice the depth of the absurd military confrontation with Russia is vital for her region, American politicians interfere and political environment of the US capital, and their own folly, and elementary career. For this reason, as American intellectuals, and bureaucrats from the administration urgently need to start and to start developing an alternative foreign policy centers, where the policy of Russia, for example, can be understood in a different way, RIA " Novosti "." in the belief that mass share in the capital of the United States continuously informed about the annexation of the Crimea ( "donated" by the way, Khrushchev Ukraine in 1954 and populated mostly by Russians), about the presence of Russian military equipment in Ukraine. In this case, it turns out that the history of relations between Russia and Ukraine began in February 2014. There are, however, other views of the historical Process. For example, the first plans for NATO expansion To Russia's borders. Interestingly, those highbrow citizens who currently assure American citizens that arms supplies to Ukraine will force the Russian Federation to surrender, in 1990 he said that the Eastern expansion of the Commonwealth will not create issues in relations with Moscow, " says American political scientist. He draws attention to the fact that, even If the escalation of the Ukrainian fall will not lead To greater confrontation, side effects of American foreign policy are quite high. So, the United States ceased to cooperate with Russia in a number of problems on nuclear weapons." Is in America's interest to do the enemy of the most important players in the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons? Unless the United States wants to Moscow was closer to Beijing? Will there be any other consequences, balanced only hypothetical benefit from the adoption of Ukraine in the Western block of the outcome, to be honest, extremely unwelcome to most European taxpayers " asks the expert. Important explanation of the political blindness of the American elite congressmen, intellectuals, authorized both independent and corporate Washington press is careerism, " the statement said. He leads the thought expressed by the American Professor Michael Glennan in the 1st of his essays: the person who wants to advance his political career in the United States, has a chance to get a more authoritative position only If the authorities deemed him " a harsh and uncompromising, especially in dealing with foreign policy issues or in rhetoric. But, of course, within the already established consensus, such as anti-Russian." The process of transformation of the foreign policy of the administration of Barack Hussein Obama in the direction of typical "hawks" aggression arming the Kiev authorities) can be explained quite simply - the key members of the administration begin to maneuver to get space in the future administration of Hillary Clinton. This sharpness is a compulsory form of careerism for bureaucrats of the foreign policy of the bloc, " says Scott McConnell.


10px

sections: Politics

    Copyright © RIN 2005-