The aggressive foreign policy of the United States casts doubt on the correctness of handing President Barack Obama a peace prize in 2009, and for this reason he should follow the advice dismissed from the post of the head of the Nobel prize thorbj?rn Jagland and return presented him the award, says the historian Eric Suess. About it he in his article for Global Research.

Suess indicates that the awarding of this prize to the person who is more often seen worldwide in the form of George Bush? 2 " one of the most shameful page in the history of the Department.

as an example of the aggressive policy of the U.S. government analyst leads the bombing of Libya, which plunged the country into anarchy, turned it into a failed state with constant internecine religious wars ". In addition, Suess believes the U.S. involved in the coup in Ukraine, which resulted in the bombing of the East.

Also, the expert reminds about the fact that Obama received the peace prize October 9, 2009, along with this, "questions" regarding the background of the US administration for the coup in Honduras, which occurred in June 2009, after which the country became one of the leaders in the number of murders per year.

The head of the Nobel division for the first time in history, resigned from his post on March 3. Leaving your own post, thorbj?rn Jagland stated that it would be "very cute" if Barack Obama returned received the award.

sections: Politics