The speaker of the State Duma Sergei Naryshkin said that and now are "fake information" and "slanderous decision" about the Crimea, and explained their appearance search USA new zones of influence.

Sevastopol and the Crimea on March 16 underscored the 1st anniversary of the referendum in which an overwhelming number of voters voted for secession from Ukraine and reunification with Russia. In Crimea for entering the Russian Federation voted 96, 77%, in Sevastopol - 95, 6%.

"We are aware that work on the development of the Crimea is in the special conditions. Until now multiply fake information and continue to fabricate rude and slanderous solutions, which are periodically thrown in different international structures, " said Naryshkin, a speech during the plenary session.

in his vision, the authors of this fake " work under the dictation of militant American regime, whose predatory habits just don't know any borders. Naryshkin considers what is happening due to the fact that North America needs all fresh and fresh zones of influence." That's why they are pushing the Kiev government to another military provocations and for many months without success build their siege of the Crimean Peninsula. Apparently, so they understand democracy, " added the Speaker.

He also remembered his own 1st visit to Russian Crimea in the spring of 2014 and admitted that " among has the ability to be the most memorable events of my life will remain the first meetings with people in the Russian Crimea, Russian again and now forever ".

Sevastopol and the Crimea became the Russian regions according to the results of the referendum on 16 March 2014, in which the overwhelming majority of voters voted for secession from Ukraine and reunification with Russia. The US, EU and partner countries do not recognize the reunification of Russia and the Crimea, they have introduced penalties against parts of commissioners of the Russian Federation and organizations. The Ministry of foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation has stated many times that the inhabitants of the Crimea in a democratic way, in full accordance with international law and the Charter of the United Nations voted for reunification with Russia, respecting and accepting that choice and that choice is the reality that ought to be considered. Moscow was named the West's reaction to the annexation of Crimea to Russia totally disproportionate to what it was, because the norms of international law were not violated.

sections: Politics