Authorized Russian businessman Oleg Deripaska called "evidence Memorandum" of the U.S. Treasury with the justification for the imposition of penalties Against the owner of a poorly designed report, full of false claims and factual inaccuracies - the American side was guided by considerations of personal revenge, according to the office Deripaska whose answer is at the disposal of Last news . USA in April 2018 made in the "black list" (Specially designated nationals list or SDN) Oleg Deripaska and controlled organizations. Assets list members in the U.S. were blocked, and the business with them is prohibited. However, on 27 January 2019, the Treasury Department brought under punishment En and controlled by it, "RUSAL" and " EuroSibEnergo ", after that Deripaska has reduced its share below in En 44, 95% and ceased to control the firm through the Board of Directors. On Tuesday, the Office for foreign assets control of the U.S. Treasury (OFAC) after much resistance, the court still issued a list of documents justifying, in the opinion of the US government, the fairness of the punishment relative to the Russian businessman - in the so-called "evidence Memorandum" States that the owner " acted or sought to act in the interests or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, held a high post officials of the government of the Russian Federation ". In addition, "evidence Memorandum" States that Deripaska working in the energy sector of the Russian economy. In connection with these facts, As the Authors note, the U.S. Treasury, Deripaska " must be added to the SDN list ". Much of the "evidence" - articles in the Western media, based on information from other sources and assumptions. A document dated June 2018, but the U.S. Treasury Department for a long time refused to publish it and forced to do It only after the decision of the us court. In this document most of the fragments are hidden, Perhaps in order not to divulge the sources of information. Empowered entrepreneur called the Document of the Ministry of Finance of the United States " a poorly designed report, full of false claims and factual inaccuracies ". "it is outrageous, it seems that OFAC officials weren't burdened with finding evidence, engaged in a personal vendetta, destroying a person's life, his business and putting at risk hundreds of thousand of people, including workers and members of the brotherhood, as well as investors (Russian and international). This is more than professional incompetence - It's like... a Gross violation of the public service and raises serious questions of objectivity and the true objectives pursued by the OFAC investigation ", - is told in the answer of the commissioners Deripaska. As the Authors point out, the businessman was included in the "black list" due to 2 claims. About the fact that He acted or intended to act in the interests of occupying a high position of the Russian bureaucracy, and the fact that It would be As if working in the energy sector of the Russian economy. "Both claims are obviously fraudulent," claim Authorized Deripaska. "The first statement seems to be based on article ten years ago in The Nation ", - underline Empowered entrepreneur, referring to the reference U.S. Treasury for the Nation from 1 October 2008. It was stated that Deripaska told one of his closest partners, received in 2005 an aluminum plant in Montenegro, " because Putin has asked him to do It." "the publication falsely claimed that Mr Deripaska received the aluminium company KAP (" Kombinat aluminium Podgorica " ) in Montenegro, As if it were part of the Russian conspiracy, led by President Vladimir Putin in order to capture supervision over the economy of Montenegro After the independence of the state ", - said in response from Deripaska. The authors of the response explained that the Plant was purchased " not for political reasons and not because Russian President Putin or any other Russian government official tried to convince to do It." The purchase was due to commercial reasons in order to transform it (plant - ed.) into a successful commercial enterprise, explained to Commissioners Deripaska." CAP has never occupied a Central place in the economy of Montenegro, for this reason, the assumption that it was possible to buy for political reasons, is completely absurd and ignores the commercial, political and economic realities, " said They. in proof that Deripaska was represented by the Russian government, Experts from the U.S. Treasury in a private document referred to the text in the newspaper financial times of 28 October 2008, in which they quoted Deripaska. The Authors drew attention to the phrase entrepreneur about the fact that He "does not separate itself from the country" and " he has no other interests." Empowered entrepreneur, However, argue that the words "I do not separate myself from the country" completely out of context." The interview took place in 2007, when the famous Russian businessmen have left the country to invest across the border and spend time in London. Mr Deripaska was asked about why He decided to stay in Russia. The meaning of the answer lies in the fact that He just does not come off from their homeland and can not see my future anywhere else, " commented Empowered entrepreneur. They also responded to the argument of the Ministry of Finance About the presence of Deripaska's diplomatic passport. As suggested in the office Deripaska, this case "is completely irrelevant" to its inclusion in the " black list ". "Mr. Deripaska was entitled to a diplomatic passport as the Russian member of the Business Advisory Council of APEC. Council members from all APEC member States, including the United States, appointed by Their governments, which has become a necessary basis for the issuance of diplomatic passports for the fulfilment of their duties ", - said in response. Authorized Deripaska also said that in connection with the accusations against him was referred to the us Firm Endeavour Group, advising the Russian businessman. Because of this, the office Deripaska stressed that the U.S. government first acknowledged that " does not work on the Endeavour and receives no orders from the Russian Federation or any other government." Empowered entrepreneur also refute the second of the 2 main arguments of the office for foreign assets control of the U.S. Treasury - that would be As if Deripaska working in the energy sector of the Russian economy. According to Their statements, This is a gross misrepresentation. As suggested in the office Deripaska, " It once again speaks about the fact that officials working for OFAC was either extremely ill-informed About the details of the business of Mr. Deripaska, or consciously decided to ignore the fact that EN - the Firm, which was founded by Mr. Deripaska, is an energy company (oil and gas sector), but rather electricity where generation is no more than 20-25% ". "Management also indicated as a source of the fact that Mr Deripaska was involved in global forums such As the WEF and the summit of the heads of APEC countries, to support their claims about the fact that Mr Deripaska is working in the energy sector. Again this is an inaccurate conclusion ", - stated in the response to the OFAC Memorandum. "As a major international business leader, He, of course, was invited to the world's largest events. He has always been committed to setting high environmental standards in the aluminium industry and its main focus at these events, usually produced on supporting initiatives in the field of climate change, " - said in the office Deripaska. There had also rejected allegations from the U.S. Treasury to alleged Deripaska belonging to criminals. They were called absolutely false and completely unsubstantiated. "Against him were never filed charges in the Commission of the crime and did not conduct investigations, not to mention the fact that He was not convicted. These accusations simply based on the statements made in the 1990-ies of the former competitors of the Oleg Deripaska's business. No evidence to support these claims has been presented, and the underlying causes of those making demands are never considered ", - said Commissioners of the entrepreneur. in General, As pointed out by the Commissioners of the entrepreneur, a report of the office for foreign assets control has not produced Any evidence " of their old and false allegations "." It provides a distorted interpretation of public domain material, are published on the corporate websites and the media ", - reported in the response from the commissioners Deripaska. <span style="color:darkgray