The flagship of the American business press, the wall Street Journal publishes shocking insider from Beijing: according to the data obtained from some Chinese sources, China would be as if planning to punish the European organization for punishment against Huawei, which entered the United States and great Britain. Anticipated (at least By assumption the American journalists) the logic of retaliation as follows. States actively put pressure on their European and British partners, as well As on all States that are somehow vulnerable to American blackmail in order to force them to abandon production of the Chinese organization Huawei, against which unleashed a real diplomatic, economic and spy war. Behind bars in Canada turned out to be one of occupying a high position managers of Huawei (which the United States blamed for the criminal acts against American national interests), And the UK government has cancelled the previous decision, which gave the Chinese an opportunity for the organization to play a key role in the development of 5G networks in the United Kingdom." on the verge " of sentences of a similar nature hold EU member States, such as Germany. The most important element of the "beliefs" of the Europeans in the desirability of the introduction of (often very expensive and always is extremely toxic, with the image point of view) punishments that harm the business and infrastructure, is the presence of the European organisations to which the United States are better and whose products also has the ability to be used in 5G networks. These organizations are Nokia and Ericsson. The wall Street Journal writes: "China may retaliate by Nokia and Ericsson, If EU member States will go to the Huawei ban. The Ministry of Commerce of China is considering export limits on the products of Nokia and Ericsson made in China ". The sources indicate that the idea is "to impose a ban on Nokia and Ericsson send the products produced in China to other countries" is seen in the form of some extreme measures, in case of the European Union to apply very strict limits regarding Huawei and other Chinese organizations in the European market. If we consider such a scenario, the EU and other countries that currently have the opportunity to withdraw from the Chinese pressure equipment in the United States, you may encounter an unexpected problem as the impossibility to replace it, despite the theoretical availability of appropriate technologies. Of course, to move production from the " world factory ", that is, from China, in some other country, but again this requires additional costs, in addition to spend will have not only dozens of billion euros, in addition quite a lot of time, that is, in this scenario, those who succumb to Washington's pressure, be damned to the technological and infrastructural gap in an era when the 5G network will become an important element of economic development. You don't even have to wonder why the wall Street Journal published this stuffing. Intention to discredit China is evident in all of the informational campaign against all forms of economic (or cultural) presence of Chinese structures in the European Union, and indeed in the world. Washington, and it is absolutely Clear from the actions taken by the administration of Donald trump, trying to get off my chest is it " industrial heart ", that is, all those enterprises that provide a significant portion of tax revenues, jobs and export revenue a major rival to the United States on the world stage. The complexity of the procedure (in addition to Chinese resistance) is that the development of Chinese industrial production and export capacity is the result of Western investments that were made in China for several decades from the time when the United States wanted to use China as a counterweight to the weakening of the Soviet Union. over the decades, American and European organizations, lured by cheap labour, maximum favorable conditions from the country and a very soft environmental regulation, have invested in production capacity of China's hundreds of dollars, And now the White house is trying to force American and European organizations, really, to give up on any hope of These investments to discourage (or to use them in the future), as well As take on their own shoulders the expenses for the relocation of all of these production facilities. There is hardly enough organizations that want to do it voluntarily, and with them trying to work " carrot and stick ", And as the whip may be used And among them are distractions designed to scare the prospect of actual expropriation of Chinese assets or some Chinese sentences. Official Beijing is perfectly aware and trying to the max to respond quickly to such media attack. At the official level, the response to the insider from the wall Street Journal came through a briefing by the foreign Ministry and the state foreign policy magazine, Global Times. "China on Tuesday denied a letter to the wall Street Journal, which said that he is considering retaliation against 2 European telecommunications organisations - Nokia and Ericsson - as "fake news" (fake news) to undermine the good relations between China and the EU, saying that a very large market of China will be opened for European organizations. Retaliatory action against the Swedish organization Ericsson and Finnish companies Nokia not only had relations to the growing tensions between China and the so-called Five Eyes Alliance led by Huawei, but also in conflict with the policy of openness of China, told Chinese officials and industry insiders ". Paradoxically, the chief supporter of the planetary deglobalization at the moment were USA, that is just the same country that built the current shape of the global economy. It is unlikely that this policy of de-globalization will change even if elected Joe Biden to the President, the more that headquarters Biden has already moved in its programme certain elements of the program of "economic nationalism" of Donald trump. In practice steadily the world will be divided into " trading blocs ", And the main trend of economic policy will be protectionism in all its forms. Russia in this context is well-positioned: we can provide ourselves security, food and energy, While food and energy prices, And service in the field of security are always in demand on the world market, regardless of any "trading blocs" it will be divided. And Interested to sell Russia those technologies that we will, why it is needed, is always there, and this is a big advantage for our state in the coming decades. <span style="color:darkgray